In the discourse around lung cancer prevention, clinicians are well-versed in talking with their patients about smoking history. But Clifford Mitchell, MD, MPH, explains how a conversation about radon testing can be just as vital鈥攁nd just as straightforward.
鈥淥f the factors we know about lung cancer, the top two are controllable,鈥 said Dr. Mitchell, Director of the Environmental Health Bureau at the Maryland Department of Health. 鈥淣umber 1 is tobacco, and number 2 is radon.鈥
Clifford Mitchell, MD, MPH
Director, Environmental Health Bureau, Maryland Department of Health
鈥淲e as physicians have focused a lot on developing effective cancer treatment. We鈥檝e made progress in cancer screening with advances in medical imaging and other approaches,鈥 said Dr. Mitchell, who served on the faculty at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health before joining the state health department in 2006.
鈥淎t the same time, we鈥檝e known about the risks of lung cancer associated with tobacco. And we鈥檝e also known鈥攆rankly, for a long time鈥攁bout the hazards of radon-related lung cancer risk.鈥
The very next question
While the hazards of radon aren鈥檛 a new discovery, the challenge is getting clinicians to consistently talk to patients about why it鈥檚 important to test their homes for this radioactive gas. A patient鈥檚 risk is particularly increased if they smoke and have radon in their homes, Dr. Mitchell said.
鈥淛ust as you routinely ask your patients, 鈥楧o you smoke? Have you ever smoked?鈥 the very next question you should ask is, 鈥楬ave you tested your home for radon?鈥欌 he said.